Sky News host Danica De Giorgio claims left-wing media in the US are “capitulating into oblivion”.

“Let’s start with the hosts of Morning Joe on MSNBC grovelling to Donald Trump,” she said.

“And … the View co-host Sunny Hostin had to make a legal note correction about Trump’s now former attorney-general pick Matt Gaetz after she trashed him.

“I mean, how pathetic are they? Seriously.”

**The Hypocrisy of COP29: A Feast for the Carnivores

As the world grapples with the pressing issues of climate change and environmental sustainability, events like COP29 (the 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) are meant to be platforms for serious dialogue and action. However, this year’s conference has been marred by glaring contradictions that have left many questioning the integrity of its participants. One of the most striking examples of this hypocrisy is the juxtaposition of the conference’s meat-free advocacy and the lavish meat offerings available to attendees.

At COP29, while delegates and activists preach the virtues of reducing meat consumption to combat climate change, the food courts are bustling with lines for buffets serving burgers and hot dogs. In stark contrast, the vegan-only restaurant on site seems to be an afterthought, with little interest from the UN delegation. This scenario encapsulates the broader issue of how difficult it is for individuals, especially those in positions of power, to adhere to the principles they espouse when faced with the allure of indulgence.

The hypocrisy doesn’t stop there. A group called “Provid” has been vocal in its criticism of the meat offerings at the conference, insisting that future events should prioritize plant-based options. Their demands for more than 50% of the menu to be vegan at next year’s conference in Brazil highlight a growing movement towards sustainable eating. Yet, the very individuals advocating for these changes are often the same ones indulging in the very practices they condemn. It raises the question: how can we trust leaders who cannot even align their actions with their rhetoric?

This disconnect is emblematic of a larger trend at COP29, where the focus seems to be less about genuine environmental action and more about political maneuvering and financial gain. Critics argue that the conference has devolved into a platform for grifters and opportunists, seeking to extract funds from developed nations to support developing countries, including major polluters like China. The audacity of China, asking for over a trillion dollars in aid while being one of the largest contributors to global emissions, is a bitter pill to swallow for many.

The Australian delegation’s welcome to country ceremony, which was meant to honor Indigenous peoples, felt hollow amidst the backdrop of such glaring contradictions. The lack of substantial announcements or commitments at the end of the conference only added to the sense of disillusionment. It was a whimpering conclusion to what was supposed to be a pivotal moment in the fight against climate change.

In the realm of media, the left-leaning outlets have also found themselves in a precarious position. The hosts of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” recently made headlines for their visit to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Donald Trump, a move that many see as a capitulation to the very figure they have criticized for years. The juxtaposition of their past rhetoric against their current actions has left many viewers questioning their integrity and commitment to their principles.

Similarly, the co-hosts of “The View” have faced backlash for their handling of discussions surrounding Trump and his associates. A recent segment featured a legal note correction regarding allegations against Trump’s former Attorney General pick, Matt Gaetz, which only served to highlight the media’s struggle to maintain credibility in an increasingly polarized environment. The sincerity of their discussions often feels forced, as they grapple with the fallout of their past statements.

The hypocrisy displayed by both the participants at COP29 and the media covering these events is a stark reminder of the challenges we face in addressing climate change and political accountability. As the world looks to leaders for guidance and action, it is essential that they embody the principles they advocate. The disconnect between words and actions not only undermines their credibility but also erodes public trust in the very institutions meant to lead us toward a sustainable future.

In conclusion, the events at COP29 serve as a microcosm of the broader struggles we face in the fight against climate change. The hypocrisy of leaders indulging in the very practices they condemn, coupled with the media’s struggle to maintain integrity, paints a troubling picture of our current landscape. As we move forward, it is crucial that we hold our leaders accountable and demand genuine action that aligns with their rhetoric. Only then can we hope to make meaningful progress in the fight against climate change.